0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

°¡Á·ÁöÁö°¡ ³úÁ¹Áß È¯ÀÚÀÇ Èñ¸Á¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ

The Influence of Family Support on Hope of the Patients with Stroke

Çѱ¹°£È£±³À°ÇÐȸÁö 1999³â 5±Ç 2È£ p.191 ~ 205
KMID : 0869919990050020191
±è¹ÌÈñ ( Kim Mi-Hee ) - ±âµ¶°£È£´ëÇÐ

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify the influence of family support on hope of the patients with stroke. Subjects were 53 in-patients with stroke in two general hospitals and one oriental medicine hospital located in Seoul and Kwang-Ju. The instruments used for this study : The family support scale developed by Kang Hyun Suk(1985). The hope scale developed by Nowotny(1989). The Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics, t-test, ANOVA. Pearson¡¯¡¯s correlation and simple regression. Data had been collected from December 24, 1998 to January 31, 1999. The results of this study were as follows The mean score of family support was 43.94 and the mean score of the hope was 80.89. The relationship between family support and the hope of the patients with stroke revealed a significant correlation (r= .560, p= .0001). The variables influencing family support and the hope of the patients with stroke were as follows : There was significant difference between family support and general characteristic factor, which was family chief caregiver (p= .002). There was no significant difference between hope and general characteristic factors. but There were significant differences between one of the subscales of hope, ¡¯¡¯confidence in the outcome¡¯¡¯ and general characteristic factors, which were age(p= .021), perceived disability effect(p= .027). There were significant differences between one of the subscales of hope ¡¯¡¯possibility of future¡¯¡¯, and general characteristic factors, which were age(p= .016), education(p= .018). There was significant difference between one of the subscales of hope. ¡¯¡¯spiritual belief¡¯¡¯, and general characteristic factors, which was religion(p= .002). There was significant difference between one of the subscales of hope, ¡¯¡¯active involvement¡¯¡¯, and general characteristic factors, which was family chief caregiver (p= .012). It was found that the higher the degree of perceived family support, the higher the degree of hope. Clearly, the perceived family support can contribute significantly and positively to hope of the patients with stroke. Therefore, nurses should plan interventions to inspire hope level of patients with stroke by family support. The above results may be used as the basic data to seek more efficient way of elevating nursing practice and qualify for the patients with stroke.
KeyWords
Èñ¸Á, °¡Á·ÁöÁö
Hope, Family support
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI)